UBC Sauder Admissions Interview: How to Prepare

Every March a few Sauder BCom applicants get an email inviting them to an interview they did not know existed. It is not the recorded video interview you did in January; that is already submitted. This is a second, invited step, and Sauder publishes almost nothing about it. Here is what is public, what only past applicants describe, what the email probably means, and how to prepare in the handful of days you get.

By the AcceptMe team 8 min read Updated

What is public and what is not

Sauder’s BCom admission page for Fall 2027 entry describes one assessment: the Personal Profile, which is the standard UBC questions plus two Commerce-specific written answers and a recorded video interview on VidCruiter (three questions, 30 seconds to prepare, 90 to answer, you submit two). That is all done by the January 15, 2027 deadline and the Sauder Personal Profile and video guide covers it in full. Nothing on the public page describes a later, live interview for selected applicants.

Sauder does not publish the format. Applicants who have been through it describe an email from Sauder admissions in March inviting them to a scheduled interview, typically within a week or so, conducted over a video call, and most of them had no idea the step existed until the email arrived. Everything below about the live interview is labelled as reported rather than published. Treat your own invitation email as the only source of truth on timing, platform and length, and if it conflicts with anything here, the email wins.

The BIE version. The Bachelor of International Economics, UBC’s other broad-based Vancouver business-adjacent program, admits one hundred students per cohort and says it weighs achievements in and out of school alongside grades. Its admissions page does not describe an interview either, but applicants who have been through it describe a similar invitation email each spring, some quoting a line about being one of a small group under consideration. Same advice: the email is the format; the preparation below transfers directly.

What the email probably means

Nobody outside Sauder admissions knows how the interview is scored or exactly who gets one, so be careful with any claim you read that sounds certain. What can be said honestly:

  • You are still in the pool. Sauder does not spend admissions-staff hours on files it has already decided against. An invitation is a live file, not a courtesy.
  • Something in the file needs a second look. The most likely reason for a live conversation is that the written and recorded material left a question open: a strong profile with an unusual academic record, a gap between the essay voice and the video, an activity that reads as too good to check on paper. Students who get the email are often not the top of the pile and not the bottom.
  • It is not a scholarship interview. UBC’s entrance awards are decided from the academic and Personal Profile, per its published pages; if a scholarship is involved the email will say so.
  • It is not a formality. Students who treat it as one are the ones who describe their interview afterwards as “very mid.”

The useful frame: the interview is a chance to resolve whatever question your file raised, in your favour. You will not be told the question. So prepare to be clear, specific and consistent with what you wrote, on every theme a business school cares about.

Format, as applicants describe it

  • Live, not recorded. A scheduled video call, with a person on the other end, usually one admissions staff member, sometimes two. Not a VidCruiter-style timer.
  • Short. Reports cluster around fifteen to twenty-five minutes.
  • Conversational, with a structure underneath. Expect a warm-up (tell us about yourself, why Commerce), two or three questions drawn from your Personal Profile, at least one judgement or scenario question, and time for your questions at the end.
  • Notice of a few days to a week. Slots are offered, you pick one. Take the earliest one you can prepare for properly, not the earliest one available.

If any of that differs from your email, the email is right.

How to prepare in four days

Day one: reread your own file

Open the Personal Profile you submitted in January and read it as an interviewer would. Every activity, every claim, every number. Write down the three most likely follow-up questions for each long answer (“What did the other volunteers think of that?” “What would you do differently?” “How many people was that, exactly?”). The single most damaging thing you can do in this interview is contradict your own profile because you forgot what you wrote in October.

Day two: build five stories and a why

Sauder says it values diversity of thought and background, personal growth and resilience, leadership and initiative, and community engagement and impact. Have one story for each, in the STAR shape, ninety seconds spoken, with a number in the result. Then write your “why Sauder, why Commerce” answer, which must name real things about the program and about you (see the worked answer below). If your profile’s community question already said how you would use Sauder, your live answer has to match it.

Day three: unseen questions, out loud, on a clock

Not rereading notes. Have someone ask you questions you have not seen, or use a tool that does, and answer in full sentences with a timer running. The skill on the day is choosing a story in the three seconds after the question and starting to talk. Two rounds of six questions is enough. Record one and listen for filler and for answers that never reach a result.

Day four: logistics and questions to ask

Test the link, the camera, the microphone and the room. Plain background, laptop at eye level, notes off screen (you will not need them if day two was done). Prepare two questions to ask that show you have read about the program: a specific course, the co-op structure, a club, a centre. “What is the culture like?” is not a question. Then stop preparing. The what-to-wear guide covers the on-camera basics if you want them.

Twelve practice questions, business-school-fit format

These are AcceptMe’s practice questions, written to the themes Sauder publishes and to the shape of a live admissions conversation. They are not Sauder’s questions; nobody outside Sauder has those. Use them unseen, on a clock, and make each answer consistent with your submitted profile.

  1. Tell us about yourself in a way that is not on your application.
  2. Why Commerce, and why Sauder rather than the other business schools you applied to?
  3. You wrote about an activity where you took the lead. What did the people you led think of how you did it?
  4. Tell us about a time you were wrong in front of a group and what you did in the next five minutes.
  5. What is a business decision you have seen up close, at a job or in your family, that you would have made differently? Why?
  6. Describe a time you had to work with someone whose background or way of thinking was very different from yours. What did it change about how you work?
  7. You are on a four-person group project; one member has done nothing with two days left, and your mark is shared. What do you actually do, in order?
  8. What would you do with a free summer and $1,000 if you had to show a result by September?
  9. Tell us about a commitment you dropped and how you decided.
  10. Which of your Personal Profile activities are you least proud of, and why did you include it?
  11. If you are admitted, what is one thing you will do in first year that has nothing to do with grades?
  12. What questions do you have for us?

A worked “why Sauder, why Commerce” answer

The question is really two: why this field, and why this school. A weak answer says “I have always been interested in business and Sauder is one of the best schools in Canada.” Both halves are unfalsifiable. A strong answer gives a reason that could only be yours and names something about the program that a person who had not read about it could not say.

Sample answer, about 75 seconds

I want to do Commerce because of a specific problem I could not solve. My parents’ produce store loses money every January, and I have worked there since Grade 10, so I tried to work out why. I could see the numbers, but I could not read them: I did not know whether the problem was the rent, the spoilage or the prices, and I did not know how to find out. That is the gap I want to close, and I want to close it with numbers rather than instinct, which is why Commerce over a general Arts degree. Sauder specifically is because of two things. The co-op stream means I would be applying what I learn in a real business in second year, not fourth, and I have already done the unpaid version of that for three years. And the community-impact question on your application asked how I would use the program, which I took seriously: I want to get involved in the sustainability side of the school, because the spoilage problem at our store is also a waste problem, and I have not seen another program frame business that way in its own admissions questions.

Notice what it does. The reason for Commerce is a real, small problem the student could not solve. The reason for Sauder names two concrete things and ties each to the student’s own history. It also refers back to the submitted profile, which is exactly the consistency an interviewer is listening for. Adjust the specifics to what is true for you; the structure is the point.

A worked judgement-scenario answer

Question 7 above is the type most students fumble, because they answer with what a good person would feel rather than what they would do. Interviewers want a sequence, a reason for the sequence, and a line you will not cross.

Sample answer, about 80 seconds

First, before anything else, I would message the person directly, not the group, and ask what is going on. In my experience the answer is usually something real, and the tone of that first message decides whether the next two days are a fight or a recovery. Second, whatever they say, I would split their part into two pieces: the piece that must be done by them, because it needs their data or their section, and the piece anyone can do. I would take the second piece myself or offer it to the group, and give them a short deadline on the first, like tomorrow at noon, with the honest statement that if it is not there we will do it without them. Third, if the noon deadline passes, we finish without them and I tell the teacher what happened, factually, after the submission, not before. I would not pretend they contributed and I would not leave their name off; I would let the teacher decide. The line I would not cross is doing their work silently and saying nothing, because the mark would be a lie and I would be teaching them that this works.

It commits to a sequence, gives a deadline with a number, names a principle, and never claims the problem was easy. That is what “judgement” looks like out loud.

Mistakes specific to this interview

  • Contradicting your profile. Reread it. They have.
  • Treating it as a chat. It is conversational in tone and evaluative in purpose.
  • Giving the recorded-interview answer. A live interviewer will follow up. A 90-second monologue with no room for questions reads as rehearsed.
  • “It depends” as a final answer on a scenario question. Fine as a first sentence, fatal as a last one.
  • No questions for them. It signals that you have not looked past the ranking.

Where to go from here

If the email has just landed and your first thought was “tell me about yourself,” the tell-me-about-yourself guide gives you the ninety-second version that does not recite your application. If you want to see how live university interviews tend to be structured and what the standard question families are, the university interview questions guide walks through them with worked answers. If your file is strong on grades and thin on stories, the leadership questions guide explains why a title is not an answer and what to say instead. Then put it on a clock: AcceptMe’s custom interviews will ask you an unseen Sauder-style fit or judgement question with a short prep window and a two-minute answer, and hand you the transcript with the coach’s notes on where the answer never reached a result.

Keep reading